Just curious about other people's logic. If you're like me, you've probably seen rounds like this:
NEG: So, a lot of nations have this problem, but you only solve it for Russia?
NEG: Why don't you implement this worldwide?
AFF: Um... because the resolution is about Russia.
Intuitively, this just feels wrong, and sets off all sorts of "BAD POLICY" lights in one's brain. But theoretically, is there any real reason why the Aff shouldn't
arbitrarily limit their case to be more topical? (Ignoring real-life arguments, like favoritism DAs, etc.)
_________________Abe bimuí bithúo dousí abe
- "You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free"COG 2016 generics-only sourcebook
- NCFCA/Stoa (thread)Factsmith research software
- v1.5 currently available (thread)Loose Nukes debate blog
- stuff to read with your eyes.